by
bloglikesit
@ 21/01/2007 - 16:06:11
I urge you to look but don't touch!
Go read this blog entry, but don't post on his blog. If you feel the need to respond, do it on your own blog, don't give him the satisfaction. Tag it with "gay adoption" so anyone who wants to read your opinion can do so.
Click for a laugh at someone who is hopefully part of a dying breed.
So what do I think of all this?
Well...
Anyone with a sense of normaility will know that this cannot be good for the child and to me this is leglised brain washing. I'd actually go one higher and say its sickening! What gay people do with each other is up to them but I pity any child who'll be raised and forced into thinking this is normal social behaviour and with a liberal attitude that this is normaility.
"A sense of normality." Normality is individual, fluid and subjective. What is normal for one person is not normal for another person. What is normal at one time is not normal at another time. What is normal for one group of people is not normal for another group. If you don't understand that then you have problems.
I appreciate that "the norm" is taken to be what is normal for the majority of society as a whole. But have you ever thought that people with your point of view might now be in the minority, and therefore "abnormal"? Surely if you had the majority, something would have been done about the "sickening" trends you are so bothered about?
Have you actually spoken to any children brought up by gay parents, whether biological or adoptive? From your post, I don't think you have. And yet you pity them? I'm sure they are so grateful that you find their lives pitiful.
"...forced into thinking this is normal social behaviour..." Who are you to say what is normal? My life seems pretty normal to me.
What gays do with each other is no one elses business, when kids are involved it is.
Good grief! Next they'll be sending kids to peadophilles because there ain't no one normal left but gays and peados once being a paedophile becomes legal too
I assume that when you say "what gays do with each other" means sex. What does that have to do with looking after kids? Why do you associate homosexuality with paedophilia? Do you assume that a straight couple will involve a child in their sex life? No. Despite your protestation, you have compared gays with paedophiles.
Where do you stand on the issue of gay men who have kids? Should their kids be taken away from them and given to "normal" couples to look after? Look at the shocking numbers of kids in the care system, all these straight couples are obviously doing such a great job. Parents are parents, some are good, some are bad, and who they choose to have sex with does not have anything to do with that.
I am a gay man and a foster carer. The two things have nothing to do with one another. I look after kids, I get them up for school, I cook their dinner, I help them with their homework, I play computer games with them. Sometimes, after the kids are in bed, my partner and I go to our bedroom and have sex. Where is the difference between us and a straight couple?
I am drawing to the fact that it was once illegal not so long ago to be a practising gay. Laws have liberalised and once again ask, where does liberalisation end?
Get a grip, look at how many laws from the past are no longer recognised. People weren't exactly encouraged to have relationships with black people not so long ago, does that mean mixed race couples shouldn't be able to adopt?
Just because there is an archaic law prohibiting something does not mean that law is right. Laws are amended and introduced all the time. It's not "liberalism", it's normal progress. If we didn't change things as we grew as a society we would be stuck burning witches and denying women the vote.
Why was homosexality illegal? Religion. The bible says it's bad.
Take a look at this. It' a letter supposedly written to Dr. Laura, a woman in America who thinks that homosexual people are aberations.
Dear Dr. Laura,
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.
a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?
f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?
i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.
So much for the bible shaping our laws, eh.
For more on ridiculous and outdated laws, take a look at this site: Dumb Laws. The law against homosexuality is one that has been repealed because people realised it was unfair. It's a like being born a man, or being born black. It's not a choice, it's a fact.
As for the numbers of gay people adopting, as far as I am concerned, if a person (or couple) has the inclination, the ability and the skills to be able to adopt, it is ridiculous for kids to lose out on a family environment because the adopters happen to be gay. If you had ever been through the adoption process you would know that it is quite stringent, and people are rejected as prospective adoptive parents all the time. If someone is not fit to adopt, they are not allowed to adopt. It is not a case of going along to the orphanage and picking out a kid (unless you are Madonna, apparently).
Also, your original post uses statistics, it says the number of gay couples adopting (and only in some areas, I note) is rising by 50% per year. OK, say there are 2 gay couples adopting. Next year, there are 3 couples adopting. Oh my God! That's a 50% increase! Statistics don't show anything but what the person who compiled them wants to say. The actual numbers quoted in that article are 47 in 3700. Hardly a significant figure in any case.
I have often maintained that Social Workers are the evil of society and have proof of this with my own high court battle won in london against Social Services in 1989.
Sounds like you had a bad experience. Not uncommon, unfortunately. But you are doing it again! Tarring all social workers with the same brush! Not all social workers are bad at their jobs, some are fucking excellent. And you won your high court battle in 1989, suggesting the events in question took place a while before that.
That was a long time ago now, and (possibly even due to your victory) things have changed for the better - society has moved on, it seems to have left you behind.
I just read your response to PaddyUK.
Gay people expect EVERYONE to agree with them.
Like you do, you mean? When you accuse people trying to debate the other side of the argument of trying to "brainwash" you? At the end of the day we are not condemning you as a person because of something you have no control over. I think we have a right to be a little indignant.
Kids haven't got a choice, Social Services take care of that.
All the kids that come to stay with us are aware of the situation. It is explained to them in an appropriate manner. All the kids have a say. Your experience of social services is obviously biased and coloured by your past. We have had a total of 1 child say he would rather not come to stay with us. He did not come to stay. Kids today are not as stupid as some adults, it seems.
I have the right to my opinion, like it or not. I don't agree, simple.
You do have a right to your opinion, but you would be more credible if you didn't just read one article and spout some reactionary bile.
So that makes me a Hitler you cretin.
It's not your opinion that makes you a Hitler, it's the way you put it accross. You cretin.